Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Reality TV

On Crimewatch the other day, half the villains were black, a couple more were Asian and one was white. I don't know how they get away with it. Don't they know that simply isn't allowed?

If the makers of Crimewatch bothered to watch some modern thrillers they would see how things really are, especially if the director considers himself to be 'radical' and 'cutting edge'. All criminals are thuggish looking white men with skinheads and Mr Big the crime boss is a well spoken white gentlemen. There will be a corrupt Police Officer who is easy to spot because he looks a bit funny and never laughs. He is also white with very little hair. There are definitely no Middle Eastern men running round shouting at Allah before going 'pop!'

If I was bald I would definitely sue the makers of these films for discrimination or something innit.

ps. The BBC have denied rumours that they are filming a tv adaptation of 'Tintin in the Congo'

34 comments:

British National Party member said...

Here's another reality show factoid;

Wife Swap, C4, 2003

'In 2003 a show about a racist white couple paired with a black couple went unaired. The couples said the makers, RDF, dropped the episode because the families got along.'


First seen over at UK commentators.

Hill said...

Congrats on having the bottle to bring up a topic which is almost guaranteed to get you accused of being a racist.

The BBC is a good example of a publically funded body that goes out of its way to portray blacks and Asians as law abiding all round good eggs.

Women are always portrayed as strong independant characters.

Only white males are allowed to be weak minded or criminal.

alanorei said...

I agree. Well done Mr C.

I have watched the programme regularly for several years and Frank is speaking truth that even the BBC can't hide.

As indicated above, he and anyone agreeing with him will have to be 'blog-shot' like any truthful messenger with unpalatable news.

I would also estimate that of the white criminals, a disproportionate number are eastern European.

But what's even worse on CWatch, the investigating police officers are almost all 'hideously white.'

I think I've only seen one black (or mixed race) detective amongst the vast number of white Caucasians.

It's as bad as Last Night of the Proms from all the places that the programme is broadcast, not just the Albert Hall.

I am wondering if the BBC will pick a non-white male to replace Nick Ross as the male presenter and 'partner' Fiona Bruce. This is a propaganda device used throughout the media, not just on the BBC, and especially on childrens' programmes - I've been keeping track of it for some years now.

On a more sombre note, the disproportionate number of white Britons being killed by non-whites or foreign whites versus the reverse is genuinely frightening.

This does not include other violent crimes where I understand the same trends are evident.

Jeanie said...

The whole of the public sector has quotas and guidelines to increase the number of ethnic minorities employed. (I'm a manager in the NHS, my husband's a teacher)

It's known (unofficially) as reverse discrimination and is meant to ensure that publically funded organisatiions eg the NHS, Police Force and Teaching reflect society as a whole.

I can understand the reasons why they do it but it does gall a bit that people aren't selected purely on ability.

It can be difficult for them as well because there is always the suspicion amongst their colleagues that they only got their position because of being a minority.

Anonymous said...

slippery slope arguments a plenty.

your skin colour doesn't make you more likely to commit crime.

No supprise that the local BNP drop in with comments such as "I would also estimate that of the white criminals, a disproportionate number are eastern European."
Estimate based on what sherlock? any excuse for a bit of non brit bashing.

Dawson said...

There is no evidence whatsoever that your skin colour makes you more likely to commit crimes apart from the Government's Crime statistics.

Oh.

Anonymous said...

have you actually read them?

"Surveys of the general population suggest that there is little difference between ethnic groups in terms of offending rates."

http://www.cre.gov.uk/Default.aspx.LocID-0hgnew04s.RefLocID-0hg00900c002.Lang-EN.htm

Sir HM said...

Mr Chalk

Sir, it's good to see a teacher starting to 'get it' at last.

Anonymous

You don't know what you're talking about - and i'm not even going to try arguing with you because you not only wont see it - you are ideologically incapable of seeing it - because no matter what I say, you'll just come back with 'who compiles the statistics?'.

I had this very argument last night with a profound anti-semite. I just could not convince him that Jews are no danger to us but Muslims are. "ah, but who owns the press and the internet" he said. You just cannot get through that brick wall of such thickness. You have that self-same thickness.

How come, in the past two and a half years there have been just under 130 murders of native Brits by immigrants, but only 8 murders of immigrants by native Brits?

This is analogous to reports coming out of Holland, America, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, France ... everywhere that produces such statistics in fact.

Or are ALL white people everywhere, forever, just racists?

You're an idiot and I'll waste no more time with you.

Anonymous said...

Did the CRE not notice that Blacks represent 16% of the prison population yet make up only 2% of society in the UK?

Homer said...

I think this is the report that the CRE are talking about.

http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs06/s95race05.pdf

Homer said...

Sorry that link didn't come out

http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs06/s95race05.pdf

British National Party member said...

Anon said;

"your skin colour doesn't make you more likely to commit crime."

Which is true. Ive noticed this happening a bit more recently - lefties always try and steer the debate towards 'skin colour', as they know full well that no one is more likely to hit someone over the head when they come out of a tanning salon as they are when they go in it. Of course that's patently absurd which is why they say it.

Its reminds me of how they perverted the argument by attacking Britain and saying that anyone who is born here can be 'Just as British as you are I', and now that that has become fairly entrenched I am starting to see more and more of them saying the same thing about England specifically but also Scotland Wales and Ireland.

You see, if they can get you to wilfully ignore the obvious and submit to their vision at the start by using 'political correctness' - I.E Cultural marxism - then they have already put their reins in your mouth and control where you go look from there.

Its like Winston in the book '1984'. All they had to do is crack his initial instinctual resistance to their regime and in no time at all he believed everything they wanted him to, even that they were holding up 5 fingers when they were only holding up four.

Cling to your rock!

Anonymous said...

wow, someone mentions government statistics to back up his argument, when the statistics are presented and it is shown that they do not support his views then people have to resort to personal attacks and more shitty statictics

First of all I am a science teacher, I firmly believe that science may not tell us what's true, but it's the best defence against what we want to believe.
Think about that for a second.

Secondly I'm not a lefty, I'm a centralist.

Anon, nit picking data without taking into account the rest of the data in the report doesn't make your argument stronger. If you bothered to search further you would see that having a non white ethinicty makes you more likely you be stop searched, suspected for a crime or harrassed by a majority white police force. Also looking at the home office statistics (http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs2/r195.pdf) it would appear that blacks are more likely to be conviced for robbery or drugs than whites, possibly related to socioeconomic factors, while whites are more likely to be conviced for sex crimes and violence.

Anyway, cling to your irrational hatred. Fear those who you don't want to or care to understand and be sure to believe every word you read in the sun and daily mail over actual research (Hint: MMR is not dangerous, WiFi will not kill you, immigrants are not the cause of britains problems, the sooner you start realising that, the sooner we can focus on fixing britain)

alanorei said...

Anonymous said...
slippery slope arguments a plenty.

your skin colour doesn't make you more likely to commit crime.

No supprise that the local BNP drop in with comments such as "I would also estimate that of the white criminals, a disproportionate number are eastern European."
Estimate based on what sherlock? any excuse for a bit of non brit bashing.


If you are genuinely interested in the statistics of non-white and foreign white homicides against white Britons versus the reverse, I can forward them.

They come from a site called The Fallen List, http://thefallenlist.blogspot.com/

and the MSM, who are always quick to broadcast the death of a non-white or foreign white at the hands of a white Briton.

That way you can make a realistic judgement.

The basis for the disproportionate number of foreign white criminals is that since January 2005, 10 white Britons have been killed by white foreigners, i.e. either eastern or southern Europeans, versus 2 white foreign (Polish) victims of a white Briton killer.

You really should do some research before sounding off with the usual leftist dogma.

Re: immigrants not the cause of Britain's problems and fixing Britain.

So, specifically, how do we fix Britain? What are the essential steps, how will you measure progress and what is the projected timescale?

Anonymous said...

ahh nothing like a dodgy 3rd party source with an agenda.

Let's see.....prison population of foriegn nationals = 10 %
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs2/r228.pdf
percentage of non brits in the uk just under 15%.
try again.

alanorei said...

Anonymous said...
ahh nothing like a dodgy 3rd party source with an agenda.

Let's see.....prison population of foriegn nationals = 10 %
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/
rds/pdfs2/r228.pdf
percentage of non brits in the uk just under 15%.
try again.


You haven't addressed the issue, but merely resorted to obfuscation.

You cannot deny that the victims referred to are DEAD and that nominally white foreigners + non-whites (either foreign or born here) killed them in disproportionately high numbers.

From the source YOU quoted, my emphasis:

Ethnic minority groups made up 22% of the male prison population and 29% of the female
population.

10% of the male prison population and 20% of the female prison population were known
to be foreign nationals.


Your 15% has to include ethnic minorities. See http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/
siteinfo/newsround/minority2.html

Depending on the amount of overlap between ethnic minorities and foreign nationals, the 2 together could account for up to 25-30% of the male prison population, i.e. way out of proportion with the general population, even now.

YOU try again - and provide an answer for Mr C's original observation about Crimewatch, which shows that even the BBC can't hide the disproportionation.

And while you're about it, please have the courtesy to answer my questions posed above about 'fixing' Britain - without resorting to evasion or obfuscation.

Anonymous said...

you're honestly expecting me to take a website with an obvious bias as statistical evidence to back your argument?
Your source is flawed. not much to say past that since it's likely that such a bias will lead to picking at data.

Secondly it's to be expected that there will be more ethnic on national murders than national on ethnic considering the 6% of the UK population representing ethnics is spread unevenly around the country.
Most brits live in areas with few minorities whereas minorities live in areas where brits form the majority population, hense they are more likely to come into contact with brits than the reverse.
Your source also fails to point out that the majority of ethnic murders are against people of the same ethnicity. Nothing like a bit of biast data picking to back up your argument :(


As for CW UK,the data is flawed, first of all the sample size is too small to give any meaningful results, secondly the data was not randomly selected from all unsolved crimes that month. If you don't understand the importance of random selection then try repeating your GCSE's

As for fixing britain? instead of concentrating on smokescreens thrown up ( i.e. benefit fraud etc..)to distract from the real wastes of money (12 Billion and counting wasted on NHS IT upgrades (and other PFI) that didn't need doing in the first place, billions lost in tax revenue thanks to corporate tax evasion, no affordable housing for young people etc...)...well start there...

alanorei said...

Anonymous said...
you're honestly expecting me to take a website with an obvious bias as statistical evidence to back your argument?
Your source is flawed. not much to say past that since it's likely that such a bias will lead to picking at data.


The victims are still DEAD. The site merely accesses various local news sources which report the killings and then compiles them. This is not bias, it is summary reporting.

Secondly it's to be expected that there will be more ethnic on national murders than national on ethnic considering the 6% of the UK population representing ethnics is spread unevenly around the country.

Irrelevant. The victims are still DEAD.

Your comment is unlikely to reassure the families of the 127 white Briton victims of non-white or white foreign killers since January 2005 (versus 8 of the reverse).

6% is way too low. Even the 2001 census gives 8%. It may be as high as 14% and is definitely growing rapidly - especially among school children populations. Even the BBC admits that around 300,000 immigrants enter the UK each year, while 100,000 native Britons leave. The net influx is unsustainable and the emigration makes a bad situation worse, w.r.t. the degeneration of Britain's national and racial identity.

Your source also fails to point out that the majority of ethnic murders are against people of the same ethnicity.

You mean like drug turf war drive-by shootings and 'honour' killings - the latter grossly underestimated by official sources?

Nothing like a bit of biast data picking to back up your argument :(

Home Office figures indicate 800-1100 homicides per year, as does David Fraser, in A Land Fit For Criminals.

It is true that race is not a factor in most homicides, but this is probably thanks to voluntary 'apartheid' i.e. the multi-culti experiment is a failure.

That failure is fortuitously beneficial in that it helps keep the number of interracial homicides low - for now - but government aims of forced integration can only increase the number - as your comment tacitly admits.

Within the broad category of homicides, an alarming and persistent trend of disproportionate killings of white Britons is identifiable, nevertheless.

How bad is it supposed to get before it is acknowledged as a 'problem'?

As for CW UK,the data is flawed, first of all the sample size is too small to give any meaningful results, secondly the data was not randomly selected from all unsolved crimes that month. If you don't understand the importance of random selection then try repeating your GCSE's

The programme focuses upon at least a dozen villains each episode. It is broadcast about 10 times a year. Over a period of about 7 years (the time I have been watching) that amounts to a fairly respectable sample size.

Re: non-randomly selected data, I'm sure the data isn't randomly selected. That is the whole point. If there was any way the BBC could feature 100% white Briton villians, I have no doubt it would.

But even the anti-white Briton BBC can't hide the ugly truth.

As for fixing britain?...

Unilateral withdrawal from the EU would save Britain over £200,000,000,000 a year.

See http://eutruth.org.uk/#Queen

Some of that could help young couples w.r.t. affordable housing.

Halting and reversing immigration would prevent an untold number of deaths in the developing world through callous government poaching of overseas medical staff. It would also help qualified medical staff in this country to obtain jobs instead of having to emigrate to Canada or the USA to get work.

Ending and reversing immigration (and multiculti-ism) would also cut back drastically on the estimated £125,000,000,000 of public money required for additional housing over the next 20 years.

It would also terminate the estimated £11-15 billion annual cost of credit card fraud (75% of all credit card fraud) that foreigners perpetrate in Britain annually. The costs of drug smuggling, people trafficking, prostitution etc. are additional to that.

See Overcrowded Britain by Ashley Mote.

The financial cost is of course small compared to the distress caused to those defrauded, thanks to political obsession with 'diversity.'

Re: employers. They need to be brought to heel for job offshoring and importation of cheap labour - i.e. an estimated 2,000,000 Poles in the last few years.

If this was done, that could also help young couples w.r.t. employment and affordable housing.

You might also like to consider the race - and religion - of those responsible for major terrorist outrages since and including the July 7th 2005 atrocity.

White Britons are conspicuous by their absence.

Muslims are committed to making England the first European Muslim country. See The Islamic Invasion by Robert Morey.

Successive governments are giving them every incentive so to do.

The Sunni versus Shia civil war in Iraq shows what Islamification of Britain would be like. Each group is as vicious as the other and hardly likely to be merciful towards remaining white Briton 'dhimmis.'

Finally, we have not seen the full impact of 'diversity' yet.

This site shows what it is like.

http://www.africancrisis.org/
Photos45.asp

The same trends are evident in the USA, which is not hard to prove.

You may feel that Mandela was somehow a great campaigner for 'justice' etc. But that will be cold comfort when the killers' blood brothers in terror over here come for you, and your family.

Jon478 said...

We must agree on the facts before we can debate the causes.

According to the CRE report

http://www.blink.org.uk/print.asp?key=2982

blacks are 9 times more likely than whites to be in prison.

Now does anybody not accept these figures (available from other sources by googling) or can we move on to the reasons why they are so different?

Anonymous said...

"The programme focuses upon at least a dozen villains each episode. It is broadcast about 10 times a year. Over a period of about 7 years (the time I have been watching) that amounts to a fairly respectable sample size.

Re: non-randomly selected data, I'm sure the data isn't randomly selected. That is the whole point. If there was any way the BBC could feature 100% white Briton villians, I have no doubt it would.

But even the anti-white Briton BBC can't hide the ugly truth."

"You might also like to consider the race - and religion - of those responsible for major terrorist outrages since and including the July 7th 2005 atrocity."

And these two comments are why I'm tired of arguing with you. You do not have a grasp of basic statistics (GCSE level), and conviently ignore that for the last 50 odd years britain has been a victim of terrorism by british white catholics. Regardless the actions of the few should not allow judgement of the many.
Your blame of immigrants for all of the UK's problems is not unlike Hitlers blaming of the Jew's for Germany's problems.


Jon - The reasons for those statistics are not as simple as black = criminal. I wish it were that simple.

alanorei said...

You do not have a grasp of basic statistics (GCSE level), and conviently ignore that for the last 50 odd years britain has been a victim of terrorism by british white catholics.

You don't seem to grasp the basic fact that the white Briton victims are DEAD.

And regardless of the 'few versus many' argument, regularly trotted out by lefty apologists for atrocity, the disproportionation still exists, with respect to interracial killings, which cannot be concealed by any kind of statistical manipulation - no matter how much you would like it to be.

I think Sinn Fein/IRA would feel mightily insulted, even outraged, at being called "British."

If you want to know about Catholic Irish terrorism, you should read Catholic Terror in Ireland by British historian Avro Manhattan.

Rev Ivan Foster's website, http://www.ivanfoster.org/
main.asp, is also a valuable source of information.

Both Catholicism and Islam have a common objective - the destruction of Protestant Britain.

If you don't believe that, you clearly don't know much about either system.

Therefore, if Catholic terrorists were still doing the business that the Mozzies are doing for them now, I would include them in the 'foreign white' category, which you seem to have overlooked in my earlier posts - they certainly could not be described as 'white Britons.'

Your blame of immigrants for all of the UK's problems

A lie. Immigrants as a group are included in the whole of the non-white + foreign white population of the UK, who are responsible for a disproportionate amount of violent crime against white Britons. This was my specific point on this issue.

As I recall, 3 of the 4 7/7 bombers were not immigrants.

But that does not amount to all of the UK's problems, which I illustrated by reference to the EU.

Britain's problems actually go much deeper but that is beyond the scope of this thread.

I'm tired of arguing with you.

Pity.

"I have not begun to fight!"

- Captain John Paul Jones, of the Bon Homme Richard

P.S. If you want to know who was really to blame for Germany's pre-WW2 problems, I recommend Jesuit Plots from Elizabethan to Modern Times by Albert Close, p 39-40.

(Another clue - AH belonged to the same church as Gerry Adams and Sharia Blair.)

If you want to know why Jews are NOT to blame for any of Britain's problems (in fact the reverse is true), I would be happy to post some material I forwarded to Melanie Phillips some time back, which she acknowledged with thanks, though it is OT for this thread.

In the meantime, you might care to obtain Middle East Diary, 1917-1956, by Colonel Richard Meinertzhagen (a British Army officer of non-Jewish Danish parentage, who served on General Allenby's staff in WW1).

That work will help you get some things in correct perspective.

Anonymous said...

qveg"Therefore, if Catholic terrorists were still doing the business that the Mozzies are doing for them now, I would include them in the 'foreign white' category, which you seem to have overlooked in my earlier posts - they certainly could not be described as 'white Britons.'"

Very selective of you. Northern Ireland is part of the United Kingdom, regardless of nationalist wishes, they are still classified as British. Or does British now only people who agree with you?

"Both Catholicism and Islam have a common objective - the destruction of Protestant Britain."

So are the 1 million or so Roman Catholic church goers in the UK (that's more than CofE by the way http://www.vexen.co.uk/UK/religion.html) also not British? do they want to destroy "Protestant Britian",are they "enemies of the state"?

alanorei said...

they are still classified as British.

Not by them. (I'll like to see you proclaim the above in a pub in West Belfast - hope you've insured your kneecaps.)

"1 million or so Roman Catholic [regular] church goers in the UK (that's more than CofE by the way)"

Yes, thanks to ARCIC - Vatican strategy is right on target.

"are they [RCs] "enemies of the state"?

The head of their church is, as is their whole hierarchy - according to Cardinal Manning's declaration of 1859. See also Vigilance, a Defence of British Liberty by Ashley Mote, p 125ff.

See also The Principality and Power of Europe by Adrian Hilton.

Getting back to Mr C's original topic, I don't if you saw Crimewatch Solved last night. Horribly biased. 2 white Briton villains versus 1 black and 3 Asian villains. I don't what the BBC is coming to.

P.S. If athemax is lurking out there, I've had a reply from Prof. Bouw on the questions you raised on the other thread, if you're interested.

jon478 said...

So if we accept that there are nine times as many blacks in prison as whites, what do we think the rasoms are for this?

Lack of fathers staying to help bring up their child?

Lack of role models?

Different cultural attitudes to crime?

Bias against them by Police, CPS, Magistrates and Judges?

Anonymous said...

alanorei - Well there we have it, it's not just the 'non british' brits you don't like, but now catholic brits. What next? smoking brits? brits with brown hair?

And I've already explained why the CW data is irrelevent, as I said take a basic crash course on statistics and the importance of random data.

Jon - All of the above + others such as failure to take responsibilty for their own actions instead choosing to play victim, piss poor education (considering the largest black communities exist in inner citys) and lack of prospects.
But then again, these factors also apply to anyone at the low end of the money tree.
Search Athens for the god knows how many papers written on the subject if you have a spare year or so.

alanorei said...

Anonymous said...
alanorei - Well there we have it, it's not just the 'non british' brits you don't like, but now catholic brits. What next? smoking brits? brits with brown hair?


As usual, you ignored all the supporting references and resorted again to ridicule in order to evade the issues.

See Science vs Evolution by M. Bowden, Appendix 4, A List of Deceptive Stratagems, Tactic No. 26.

And I've already explained why the CW data is irrelevent, as I said take a basic crash course on statistics and the importance of random data.

You haven't explained anything.

You simply assumed (Tactic No. 3) that the programme can't be right because it reveals a disproportionate amount of ethnic-based serious crime.

More than a hint of circular reasoning there as well (Tactic No. 7).

I suggest you should see if you can sign up to the BBC's 'crash course' on teaching its employees the virtues of basic honesty.

The Crimewatch data, b.t.w., is not 'irrelevant' (please note correct spelling) to the victims of the crimes or those close to them - disproportionately all victims of ethnic-based crime.

If you want to know how ethnic-based crime in Britain is shaping up, including w.r.t. how law enforcement and the media are responding to ethnic-based crime, I suggest do a search on 'Keith Brown murder' in Stoke, July 5th 2007.

The lying BBC called it "a neighbour dispute."

Obviously the 'crash course' has its limits.

Anonymous said...

The link below demonstrates how even the number plate recognition cameras are biased against blacks.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article717768.ece

Or on the other hand, maybe we should stop making excuses for them.

Blunt said...

seen this White racist terrorist?


scum

Anonymous said...

'He believes that there is a high chance of civil war in this country before too long if uncontrolled immigration continues.'

Well he is probably right; let's be realistic.

'He was stockpiling explosives only to defend himself.'

Well he would say that, but if it was true then he is probaby wise to do so.

I can't help but think that he will be another sad old man who is later proved right by events

The Tefltradesman said...

It's all so obvious really. The reason why only 2% of the nation is black, but 16% of the prison population so, is that the horrible white policemen try twice as hard to catch a darkie. Of course it's discrimination!!

Also, everybody knows that many black people have poor eyesight (probably due to insufficient milk-nursing), therefore they can't see well at night and trip over the gaps in the pavement when escaping from Plod. So yes, it's biological too!!

The Laughing Cavalier said...

From the Online Guardian...

"That fact has added to a growing sense of crisis in black America. The deaths came in the same week as a Justice Department report revealed that half of all murder victims in America are black, yet black people make up just 13 per cent of the population. It followed the brutal murder of black newspaper editor Chauncey Bailey, gunned down in broad daylight in San Francisco, who was known for his investigative work. Many are now calling for a national effort to combat violence and poverty in black America. 'It is a social epidemic and it is going to take a multiple-front war of effort to confront this issue,' said Marc Morial, president of civil rights group the National Urban League. 'Unless that happens we are on a slope going down.'
But for now the focus remains on the tragedy in Newark where it seems even the brightest and best of black America cannot avoid falling prey to the plague of street violence. The four victims - two male, two female - were all 'good kids' who had stayed out of trouble. Yet on 4 August they were shot, execution-style in the head, in the innocent surroundings of a school playground.

Only one survived, a bullet still lodged in her face. The reaction to the murders has been a mixture of disbelief and outrage, even in Newark, which has long been a byword for urban blight and a sky-high murder rate. The city's fortunes have been in a rut since it was scarred by race riots in 1967 which saw 26 people killed and ended with massive white flight. Though it is trying to reinvent itself, the latest deaths have raised questions about how much has changed. 'We can't live like this any more. Hopefully, it's a watershed moment in the city,' said Garry McCarthy, its police director."

A 'watershed moment' - or a prelude to Civil War? First, black on black, and then...???

Anonymous said...

Aha! Ive seen this crappy leftie red herring before. Because Irish Catholic terrorists have killed a lot of people, not wanting to allow murderous ethnic minorities into our country is immoral and inconsistent.

OK how simple do we have make this? Im at sea in a boat with a leak (I wish it wasnt leaking and I would like it to stop, and Im trying to plug it). But...along comes a member of the crew and bangs another hole in the boat with a chisel.

"Oi" says I "What the hell are you doing?"

"What are you worrying about you hypocrite" says he "after all there is already a leak, what does it matter about this one?"

Look how flawed the leftist argument for immigration is. They are actually saying immigration is OK because we are only bringing in killers who are doing what the IRA once did. Great, excuse me for not jumping for joy over that. And if the IRA ever go back into business? All the new immigrant crims will go home?

Anonymous said...

Different ethnic groups definitely show different propensities to crime.

Black criminals in UK and the US outperform their white counterparts to a noticible degree. Arrest rates, prosecution rates, crime victimsation surveys, Home Office and FBI stats all seem to confirm this.

For the racist explanation to be true multiple jurisdictions, legal systems, juries etc would all have to working in collusion. Or under a centralised authority. So police and courts in Los Angeles would have to be discriminating against blacks there to the same degree as in London. Its not impossible but really, honestly, how likely is that?

If it really is racism how come police and courts in Liverpool or Toronto turn out to be just as racist as each other? What the chances?

If racism is real how come Indians and Chinese people are arrested and convicted at a lower rate than whites. Again at a similar rate in the US as the UK. All these evil racist cops are in effect discriminating against whites by 'letting off' Indians and Chinese. Why would they do that then?

Or is that Indians & Chinese really do commit less crime than whites or blacks. But horror of horrors that would mean that arrest and conviction rates really do reflect something other than racist policing. If thats true it could just be true that the same goes for black arrest & conviction rates.

The problem is if you wade through Home Office stats you can find the relative scores for different groups re murder, rape etc Its not easy to do. And why isnt it easy? Presumably because our betters dont want the peasants finding out too much.

Amazingly a leftie can then pop up and say that the figures are compiled by evil whitey to make black people look bad. Its laughable really given that, if anything, they are trying to hide the level of black crime like good little cultural marxists.

Another point to make about the vast white elite conspiracy to make black people look bad (you know, like the way the BBC manage to avoid descriptions of suspects in black-on-white violence) is why does popular culture not reflect this (as already mention earlier) and even more simply why doesnt whitey stop black folks coming to live in our countries.

Contact Law said...

Solicitors

Using the free Contact Law service allows you to access thousands of solicitors throughout the UK. Our solicitors can advise you on all areas of law including wills, tax planning and trusts, power of attorney, probate, contested probate and confirmation. Using Contact Law saves you time searching for the right solicitor and provides you with peace of mind through knowing that you are accessing top quality and good value legal advice.

http://www.contactlaw.co.uk/